PRINTABLES

WORKSHOPS
SEARCH
DISCLOSURE

SALLYJSHIM may occasionally include affiliate links in posts. If you follow a link and purchase from an affiliate site, I may receive a small commission from that purchase. Products featured on this blog are items I personally like and are consistent with my aesthetic. The revenue earned from affiliate links goes toward covering the expenses of running the blog as well as a means to continue providing original content on the blog.

Products which have been gifted for review on SALLYJSHIM will be noted either by courtesy of (c/o) or an asterisk (*). I only select those products for reviews that align with our blog content.

« [CASA SHIM] SNAPSHOT 004 | Main | [WRAP] PACKAGE 008 »
Tuesday
May032011

[DESIGN] SELFRIDGES

{Selfridges}

I love to repackage sweets with a handmade touch. But these pretty little sugary sweets by Selfridges are perfect in their glass containers and yellow lids.

Reader Comments (9)

Thank you for the tip, now I know where to go when I go to London this week-end. You have a good eye for details.
Analiza

05.3.2011 | Unregistered CommenterAnaliza

I'm usually with you on the repackaging of sweets... even the smallest gift looks splendid with a touch of wrapping. ;-)
But - Oh. Wow. I NEED one of those jars! And of course, a jar filled with sweets? Just about perfect.

05.3.2011 | Unregistered CommenterCMN

ANALIZA // Have fun in London!!

CMN // I agree!!

05.3.2011 | Unregistered CommenterSALLYJSHIM

the jars + candies look so pretty. i want to get a couple of these for my work table, for "snacks". :-P

05.4.2011 | Unregistered Commenterangie

Absolutely love how simple and clean, yet playful these are. yum!

05.5.2011 | Unregistered CommenterFabra

ANGIE // Me, too!

FABRA // Yummy + cute = win win!

05.5.2011 | Unregistered CommenterSALLYJSHIM

@sally boo. they only ship within the UK!

05.6.2011 | Unregistered Commenterangie

ANGIE // :(

05.6.2011 | Unregistered CommenterSALLYJSHIM

It does not follow that because we do not subsidize smoking, we should not regulate unhealthy activities. Costs and savings are not the only variable. The fact that obesity creates costs is merely an additional reason to regulate it, not the only one. The main reason is its danger to an individual. epvbbb epvbbb - justin bieber supra.

12.6.2011 | Unregistered Commentercmbzod cmbzod

PostPost a New Comment

Enter your information below to add a new comment.

My response is on my own website »
Author Email (optional):
Author URL (optional):
Post:
 
Some HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>